The Jesus Posts
Dante1214 wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
Uzumaki101 wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
Uzumaki101 wrote...
Intelligent Post 
NOT A PARADOX!
Not to take the piss out of the joke, that is.
I mean the unstoppable force meets immovable wall scenario.
The unstoppable force would reflect off the immovable wall. There is nothing in the scenario that says the unstoppable force can move only in the direction it currently is.
It's easy to solve...with LOGIC!
But if the unstoppable force was moved into another direction, it would mean that the unstoppable force was actually stopped for a millisecond and was directed to another direction.
Also, unstoppable means it would continue in one direction since changing the direction it is going would mean that it is not unstoppable
YOUR LOGIC IS FUCKED, DANTE!!!
Not so. A force does not have to stop to change directions. Unstoppable does not mean that it would continue in one direction. It is even permitted in that situation for the force to slow down. It is only stated as being unstoppable; so the only assumption to be made is that nothing can stop it. Not that it couldn't slow down, speed up, change direction, etc., as long as it did not stop.
I agree with you, but just because the immovable object can't be moved, doesn't mean that the unstoppable force would reflect off of it. Its basic physics. For the IO to reflect the UF it would require enough elasticity to do so. However, the immovable quality of the IO implies rigidity, which would mean that while it couldn't be moved, it could be broken or something could penetrate it. Then again, there's the possibility that the impact of the two would result in something new, the Infinite Explosion.
I figured the breaking or penetrating argument was really just an argument of semantics, but you're right.
The main point is that it is not a paradox, or even a physical conundrum.
Sometimes dreams and fantasies are more comforting than the realness.
g-money wrote...
Vasuki wrote...
I do not buy apple products, main reason being I can get a generic brand MP3 player that works just as well for about a 1/4th of the price. If you want to say: "Oh, but there's not enough space!" Then I don't care, If I had time to listen to 40 gigs of music, I wouldn't need an mp3 player, I'd just use my laptop, or "god forbid", the radio.TheJesus wrote...
Fuck Ibullshit.Word. Plus, I've heard that Ipods are made to break after the year's warranty, and you can't replace the batteries unless you go to a Istore and fix it. That might be a rumor, but it's one more reason for me to hate Iproducts.
I really don't give a shit about details. I just have an unbridled hatred for Ibullshit.
Tegumi wrote...
TehMikuruSlave wrote...
I'm not deepthroating a penis.I don't have a penis.
I could provide you with one to not only try out, but enjoy, a lot.
Klorofolun wrote...
Mouse Trap? I fukken love Mouse Trap!
I liked Hungry Hungry Hippos more, but Mouse Trap had the better ads.
I tried to do that to my brother, but he put his hand up to block me and I wound up crushing his pinky finger. I wasn't wearing shoes, so even though I was wearing a sock, I felt everything through my foot. Its hard to explain. I was about 12, maybe 13, and seeing a finger coiled like a spring, knowing that I did it, was bugged the fuck out, but the feeling was an intensely disturbing combination of disgust and satisfaction.
Prowl wrote...
Tegumi wrote...
Prowl wrote...
Rbz wrote...
Serious tegumi is not seriousTegumi is roflcopter
Prowl is a roflcopter
I'm this thing?
Ossum opossum
Perhaps you are, but someday you may be this...
FreeNadia wrote...
I thank Deleta for this thread. YES all of you faithful friends and I am proud of that. True that we may differ in views, but should not this be the reason for the hostility and rivalry andThere is much FRIENDS here ^^^^
Shhh... hush monkey. The big people are talking right now.
M2991 wrote...
FreeNadia may be fail but is still the best troll.And that's why we should love... no, umm, tolerate it. At least it has its moments.
I'm waiting for the day that PETA starts attacking the alcohol industry for exposing yeast to unsafe work conditions.
Rbz wrote...
He made up the perfect catch phrase for people like us: "There is much fuck here."Hmm... do I sense a t-shirt idea?
Spoiler:
Dante1214 wrote...
Uzumaki101 wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
Uzumaki101 wrote...
Intelligent Post NOT A PARADOX!
Not to take the piss out of the joke, that is.
I mean the unstoppable force meets immovable wall scenario.
The unstoppable force would reflect off the immovable wall. There is nothing in the scenario that says the unstoppable force can move only in the direction it currently is.
It's easy to solve...with LOGIC!
But if the unstoppable force was moved into another direction, it would mean that the unstoppable force was actually stopped for a millisecond and was directed to another direction.
Also, unstoppable means it would continue in one direction since changing the direction it is going would mean that it is not unstoppable
YOUR LOGIC IS FUCKED, DANTE!!!
Not so. A force does not have to stop to change directions. Unstoppable does not mean that it would continue in one direction. It is even permitted in that situation for the force to slow down. It is only stated as being unstoppable; so the only assumption to be made is that nothing can stop it. Not that it couldn't slow down, speed up, change direction, etc., as long as it did not stop.
I agree with you, but just because the immovable object can't be moved, doesn't mean that the unstoppable force would reflect off of it. Its basic physics. For the IO to reflect the UF it would require enough elasticity to do so. However, the immovable quality of the IO implies rigidity, which would mean that while it couldn't be moved, it could be broken or something could penetrate it. Then again, there's the possibility that the impact of the two would result in something new, the Infinite Explosion.
If a maid didn't get it, time would. That's just what happens with material objects. Unless it has some sentimental value, its kind of irrational to go ape shit about it being broken, especially after you fixed it. The leg might not be able to move, but if you're just displaying it, what does that matter?
That's win, but it would be epic win if just as she was coming out from under the last car, it ran her over.
Catcher wrote...
And you should change the "religion" that you used to Christianity/Catholicism, because as far as I know, those are the only religions that refer to their higher deity as "God". Unless you're referring to Allah, at which you should have specified.You do realize that all Abrahamic religions, worship the same God, regardless of what they call it.
Rbz wrote...
JuiceBox47 wrote...
Why do atheists feel the need to scrutinize religion?Because we believe in logic and reason and religion, with it's invisible man in the sky who is everywhere, watching everything you do, every minute of every day, doesn't use logic much. But of course, you tell yourself "faith > logic" because there's no fucking way your parents taught you bullshit when you were young, just like parents never bullshit their kids with santa clause.
While religion doesn't seem logical with its magical tales of a big man in the sky and all the incredible shit, it seems quite logical, at least in my mind, to use allegory and different forms of narrative, accompanied by oral tradition, to teach morals, or anything for that matter.
People who tear apart beliefs because they don't make sense, and I'm not just talking about rabid atheists, are usually the ones who don't take the time to put into perspective the inner workings of the teachings of those beliefs.
I'm just gonna stop here, for now.
