Waar Posts
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
AvatarEnd wrote...
Great cosplay. and then bam. Tiger woods portrait in the background. WHO ARE YOU?!Isn't Tiger part asian?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
What makes you think id lock this? None of you understand my methods.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Kyuubi no Shinigami wrote...
I'm still working out how you can technically break a rule if you're already banned, or why to follow a rule if already banned, seems like it's a "not a member, no rule to follow" kinda thing in my head despite understanding the whole argument against her.How is it hard for you to comprehend? She was not allowed two accounts, she broke that rule, we banned her, she made another account, we will ban her again. It's not rocket science. The complaint that we didnt warn her is moot as we dont owe her a warning. We will continue to ban "her" as long as we know she has accounts here on Fakku. She can and probably will keep making accounts because as you said there is no real point in following the rule now but if we do find out who her accounts are in the future they will all suffer the same fate as the others.
@circe: I don't imagine she did have malicious intent (though I would check the rep log to be sure) but that doesn't matter all that much, it's a violation and she either didnt bother to read the rules or simply didnt care about them. The only person she can appeal to is Jacob at this point as she has proven her disregard our for rules.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Red Vodka wrote...
Waar wrote...
Red Vodka wrote...
Waar wrote...
It makes sense but I would prefer we spend our creators time on more important issues; people placing threads in the wrong section doesnt happen often enough for it to be a problem and the staff can move it just as easily when reported.I'm not an web designer, but how hard could it be to change the displayed text of a hyperlink?
You of all people know its not that simple, it being easy wont be enough to make it happen.
Edit: Re-read your post. Now I'm just fucking confused. What's not so simple about it? It seems like a very small and minor change that has absolutely no drawbacks to it.
I know what I said red, I'm saying because Jacob takes as long as he does to fix anything(even the minor stuff) that it's not as simple as it should be. For someone who complains about stuff like this as much as you do you really should have understood my meaning, you've been here long enough.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Yep.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Red Vodka wrote...
Waar wrote...
It makes sense but I would prefer we spend our creators time on more important issues; people placing threads in the wrong section doesnt happen often enough for it to be a problem and the staff can move it just as easily when reported.I'm not an web designer, but how hard could it be to change the displayed text of a hyperlink?
You of all people know its not that simple, it being easy wont be enough to make it happen.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
It makes sense but I would prefer we spend our creators time on more important issues; people placing threads in the wrong section doesnt happen often enough for it to be a problem and the staff can move it just as easily when reported.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
girutiya wrote...
Nope, punishing rule breakers is part of maintaining the order, but I do think it's best to inform the users (via PM) who're breaking the rules so the authorities and those users can discuss those things properly. What happened in this case, is that this user received no proper warning from the Admins/Mods thus no proper talks have been made. Do police officers warn you not to the first time you steal? We don't owe users a warning, it is something we have decided to give at times when we believe a user deserves one. Multiple accounts is a violation we consider most grievous and there is no real justification we accept. There are only two possible reasons this rule would have been violated and then admitted to: the user either never read the rules (ignorance not an excuse) or simply does not care about our rules. This user has just demonstrated a disregard for our site rules ensuring the moderators feel justified in their action. While I was not the mod who acted I fully support their decision to do so. Fakku is a privilege we provide for you, follow our rules or you may be banned; with or without warning.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
NeoStriker wrote...
Waar wrote...
NeoStriker wrote...
Matt wrote...
NeoStriker wrote...
Not for ponyfags and Waar:Spoiler:
Post something like that again and you'll get banned. This is your final warning.
[size=2]There you go Waar.[/h]
I hope to goodness you are not actually serious.
Matt isn't big on jokes.
*Sigh* You are the joke.
Matt likes me.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
NeoStriker wrote...
Matt wrote...
NeoStriker wrote...
Not for ponyfags and Waar:Spoiler:
Post something like that again and you'll get banned. This is your final warning.
[size=2]There you go Waar.[/h]
I hope to goodness you are not actually serious.
Matt isn't big on jokes.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
SamRavster wrote...
Waar wrote...
Lizlet L. Chelsie wrote...
Aura-Desu wrote...
Lizlet L. Chelsie wrote...
Nope, not really. Still banned.I take it you are logged on somewhere else?
Bingo.
It's like you don't understand that you're still breaking rules...
Do you think you deserve a warning now?
[font=verdana][color=green]To be fair Waar...I don't think that she really cares. With a perma IP ban at her usual location, she will use F! much, much less than before. It's not going to make an ounce of difference if her account is deleted or whatever. Still ends up with the same result.
You can needlessly pile on the punishments if you want...but it will be a waste of time.
What? That person broke a rule, was banned for it and decided to break it again. They are no longer welcome here. As long as we know someone is a user who should be banned we will continue to ban them. Do you suggest we do nothing at all simply because they know a way to circumvent our rules?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Lizlet L. Chelsie wrote...
Aura-Desu wrote...
Lizlet L. Chelsie wrote...
Nope, not really. Still banned.I take it you are logged on somewhere else?
Bingo.
It's like you don't understand that you're still breaking rules...
Do you think you deserve a warning now?
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Lucia Nanami wrote...
Rise-chan wrote...
Why the hell did you make another account, Lucia?And why the hell I can't...?
@Kanga Loo
Too much of everything is not good!
Because it's against the rules.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
As those items were released they are perfectly legitimate sources. A story doesn't need and end to qualify for this game, only a true beginning.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Satan hates you, quite a bit actually.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
You lock the thread...
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
When you make threads about rep it tends to lead to a loss of rep. Ignore it or suffer more for your lack of apathy.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
The source has to be released, so whatever game must be purchasable by average consumers.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
The characters name and facial structure is exactly the same, not to mention they are the same character if you take a different route in a game, AS IN AN ALTERNATE VERSION OF THE SAME CHARACTER.
The debate is over as I said, every time you try to "voice your thoughts" it makes me less inclined to hear you out in the future. The answer is no, deal with it or don't play my game.
The debate is over as I said, every time you try to "voice your thoughts" it makes me less inclined to hear you out in the future. The answer is no, deal with it or don't play my game.
Waar
FAKKU Moderator
Sorrow Bloodmist wrote...
SO dragging up that dead debate one of the points was that the 2 Sabers never existed alongside one another but if you play ExtraSpoiler:
Furthermore while they look similar they still look somewhat different...to me at least.
It doesn't matter how you feel, their choice of clothing color is not enough to go on.
Saber is one character.