The Jesus Posts
Basically, I've been looking for a site with either torrents or DDLs for all the Queen's Blade books. If anyone could help me out, mad kudos and shit.
I have to agree with omnicide on this. I've done many things, including DMT, DPT, acid(not orange sunshine), and homemade ether, that shit all over anything Lucky Star could ever do. Although, I have to say the most intense experiences I've had(in order) came from: DXM, Salvia, and ketamine(injected).
Waar wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Waar wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
I don't really care all that much. I'll probably watch it from time to time just in case someone fucks up and gets hurt. I'm not wishing harm upon anyone, but you have to admit, sports accidents are usually funny. Same goes for circus accidents, which is probably the only reason I go anymore.you're fucked up.
That may be true, but its not like I don't have respect for the athletes.
"its ok if I laugh at them because I respect them deep down inside..."
badcall dude.
Come on man, by now you should know that I'm not dumb enough to attempt to rationalize the joy of seeing people getting hurt with respect for their abilities. To clarify what I meant, I don't just watch the Olympics because there is a chance that they might fuck up and get hurt. I do have respect for the athletes because they've obviously put a lot of time and effort into training to get where they are.
The fact of the matter is, even if its the most humiliating thing to them, I think its funny when people get hurt or just fuck up, even if I feel bad for them.
Spoiler:
Waar wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
I don't really care all that much. I'll probably watch it from time to time just in case someone fucks up and gets hurt. I'm not wishing harm upon anyone, but you have to admit, sports accidents are usually funny. Same goes for circus accidents, which is probably the only reason I go anymore.you're fucked up.
That may be true, but its not like I don't have respect for the athletes.
I don't really care all that much. I'll probably watch it from time to time just in case someone fucks up and gets hurt. I'm not wishing harm upon anyone, but you have to admit, sports accidents are usually funny. Same goes for circus accidents, which is probably the only reason I go anymore.
Ally McFeal
Bat Dude and Throbin
Ejacula
How Granny Got Her Groove Back
Interview With A Vibrator
Moulin Splooge
Penetrator
PocAHotASS
Snatch Adams
Spankenstein
Teen MILF
Throbin Hood
Tits a Wonderful Life
Titty Titty Bang Bang
White Men Can't Hump
Bat Dude and Throbin
Ejacula
How Granny Got Her Groove Back
Interview With A Vibrator
Moulin Splooge
Penetrator
PocAHotASS
Snatch Adams
Spankenstein
Teen MILF
Throbin Hood
Tits a Wonderful Life
Titty Titty Bang Bang
White Men Can't Hump
@discordia
It took a little bit of thought, but I can now, definitively crush your argument or at least derail it. You're position is a simple form of determinism, which is extremely rigid. The bulk of your argument is centered around what you said here:
What you fail to acknowledge is the past and fact that people are able to experience new things that are beyond what they've come to know. In these situations, their existing judgment may not apply the same way, if it does at all. By your logic, what would happen here? If you find yourself in a new situation, that requires a new way of thinking, and up until this point, you've been relying on knowledge you have based only upon the experiences you're familiar with, what do you do? You've hit a fork in the road. You now have to make a choice with nothing to go on.
Had the linear chain of cause and effect that supported your argument existed, you would never come to such a situation. New experiences are inevitable and regardless of whether you failed to take that fact into account or you overlooked some minor detail, you need to go back and rethink what you've been arguing. Even if you go through the rest of your life with the same type of situations where you can apply your logic and judgment repeating, at multiple points earlier in your life, you have to had come across situations that were, at that time, new. As humans, we learn right from wrong, through experience. We have people who help us along, but unless we do things for ourself, there is no way to truly know.
I don't know if that sounding condescending or anything, but I don't mean any offense if it does.
It took a little bit of thought, but I can now, definitively crush your argument or at least derail it. You're position is a simple form of determinism, which is extremely rigid. The bulk of your argument is centered around what you said here:
nope, there isnt fate. but just consider how your judgement came to be. its the result of a series of imprints and knowledge and experience and will always come to the same decision if the situation is the same.
lets say you could chose between A and B in this situation and given your disposition or judgement or whatever you wanna call it, you would chose A. why would there be a need for a parallel universe where you chose B and for your judgement to make a different choice it would have to been either altered in some way or the situation would need to be a different one, which would thus create not only a parallel universe upon this decision, but with its very own and different past too...
lets say you could chose between A and B in this situation and given your disposition or judgement or whatever you wanna call it, you would chose A. why would there be a need for a parallel universe where you chose B and for your judgement to make a different choice it would have to been either altered in some way or the situation would need to be a different one, which would thus create not only a parallel universe upon this decision, but with its very own and different past too...
What you fail to acknowledge is the past and fact that people are able to experience new things that are beyond what they've come to know. In these situations, their existing judgment may not apply the same way, if it does at all. By your logic, what would happen here? If you find yourself in a new situation, that requires a new way of thinking, and up until this point, you've been relying on knowledge you have based only upon the experiences you're familiar with, what do you do? You've hit a fork in the road. You now have to make a choice with nothing to go on.
Had the linear chain of cause and effect that supported your argument existed, you would never come to such a situation. New experiences are inevitable and regardless of whether you failed to take that fact into account or you overlooked some minor detail, you need to go back and rethink what you've been arguing. Even if you go through the rest of your life with the same type of situations where you can apply your logic and judgment repeating, at multiple points earlier in your life, you have to had come across situations that were, at that time, new. As humans, we learn right from wrong, through experience. We have people who help us along, but unless we do things for ourself, there is no way to truly know.
I don't know if that sounding condescending or anything, but I don't mean any offense if it does.
discordia wrote...
Eranikum wrote...
Michael Mittermeier (German)Atze Schröder
Ingolf Lück
Harald Schmidt.
I doubt you know any of them :D
know all of them and atze aint good. now mittermeier and schmidt, those are comedians.
anyway...
george carlin is like the godfather of all comedy and now theres a comic vacuum no one will be able to fill...not even all of them put together
the main reason i like him is because he just kept it going, kept it real and fresh till his last days. this guy made me actually reconsider the notion of growing old, it aint all that bad if you can mentally stay in shape like this guy did.
I get what you're saying about the vacuum, but the one comedian that I would say comes closest to filling the position is Lewis Black.
kaimax wrote...
After doing the quiz, I'm a Greed and Envy person.I thought I was a Pride Guy.
:lol:
As expected, the only thing I scored high on was Sloth. I was low with Wrath and very low with envy, so much that I barely got anything. The rest were medium. Pride was the highest of the 4, Lust and Greed were about the same, and Gluttony was close to being low.
Zero!!! wrote...
apparently, I'm pride.http://www.4degreez.com/misc/seven_deadly_sins.html
Thank you for posting the link. When I was reading this thread the other day, it reminded me of that test. I went to look for it, but within seconds, I have no idea why, I started watching Ikki Tousen, then some hentai, fapped, and went to sleep.
Haha, my cock is bigger.
and I found this.
@nsl41288
I've seen the picture before, but I'm surprised I never noticed the barn.
and I found this.
@nsl41288
I've seen the picture before, but I'm surprised I never noticed the barn.
(>'.')>¿;= wrote...
The Jesus wrote...
Reality as it is, is conceived by perception. Infallible or not, one cannot deny what they experience through their senses. Likewise, if one perceives something within their mind, it is impossible to say that it doesn't exist, even if we can't have first hand knowledge of it.to keep the matter of perception of reality fresh i refer you to the symptoms of sleep paralysis. the ideology of existence versus being became a nightly ordeal for me to verify due to this condition. dark figures would appear from benighted corners and corridors with the intent of 'killing me', the reality of it being that i was forced asleep. i couldnt move and could only whisper during there approach, remaining paralyzed in somewhat of a pre-slumber. the result of these hallucinations were nightmares of me and my family dying or suffering horribly by the figures hands. i was forced to deny these acts of malicious intent verity to insure a somewhat normal childhood.
i didnt perceive these images within my mind, the mind fabricated them into reality. the only differential between these visions and a halucination is that these figures physically interacted with me, i could feel a grip on my throat or a sharp pain in my stomach.
so i ask you jesus, what does one make of something when it is perceived by the concious as a true to life threat but subconciously aware that it is capable of no physical harm? what does the experience become?
Its fairly obvious that our ideas of reality, being, and existence differ. I don't mean to say that you are wrong. Its just that I can only go on what I know. An experience is an experience, regardless of the conscious and subconscious awareness. In my personal opinion, I can say anything exists, but at the same time it doesn't. However, I find that as a subjective being, its natural to argue on the behalf of existence. Its pretty difficult for me, personally, because for so long I've attempted to see things as objectively or, more realistically, with as little subjectivity, as possible. The whole point of what I'm saying is, that from a subjective opinion anything we acknowledge, in anyway, exists.
As I argued in the way of nothingness, in recognizing that it is the absence of anything, it becomes something. Therefore, any argument regarding nothingness as not existing is pointless. In regard to dreams, the same can be said. We can deny that they are real, but in effect we are affirming their existence. Even if we ignore something, the fact still remains that in our minds there is something to ignore. Mental fabrication implies that there is something within your mind, conscious or subconscious, there is something to be fabricated. What you define as real depends on your subjective opinion, but it would seem to me that making a statement that anything doesn't exist is a contradiction of itself.
Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Damn-it Jesus! ...I was gonna do thatYou know what that means?
Spoiler:
Oh yeah, I went there...
Sloth, mos def. I don't really think I am any of the other sins. Especially pride, absolutely no way. I'm just too awesome.
