The Jesus Posts

Looks like a penguin to me.

What disappoints me is that I heard Night Terror was supposed to be in the game, but he isn't.

Not to mention the fact that a clone is only you genetically. Metaphysically, its a completely different person. Its causality is the result of another decision made in which multiple dimensions were created.

That's a great fucking suggestion.

Have you ever tried mirror gazing? I never tried it personally, but my brother did and he almost went insane. I've always believed that my mind is a lot stronger than his, so I don't know what I would see, but at some point I plan on trying it.

Rights aren't what everyone makes them out to be, but they do exist. There's nothing more that I can say that good ol' Georgey hasn't. Well that's not true because he had to speak within a limited amount of time and I have the option of typing up a wall of text the likes of which you have never seen. However, I'm gonna say that Carlin's ideas are correct. Rights are an abstraction. They're an idea. We all have rights, according to our country they may be different, but thats because apparently we need some higher body to act as an authority to dictate who gets to do what.

We all have the right to do whatever we want. It may seem kind of foolish, but we have the right to do anything because we can. Five years ago, my mom said don't smoke cigarettes. It was a bad choice on my part, but I did it anyway. I've been told not to drugs, steal, and all kinds of shit, but that never stopped me. The only things that ever stopped me from doing something were physical force, my own conscience, and my mental, emotional, and physical limitations.

The government does not give us rights. What they do give us is something to think about when it comes to specific actions. The problem is that "The Bill of Things You Should Think About Doing" just doesn't have the same ring to it as "The Bill of Rights." Take killing for example, when the government says you don't have the right to kill, what they are saying is that you can kill someone, but if you do and get caught you'll be put in jail and maybe even executed. I really don't know what else to say, the subject is just bullshit and its ludicrous to continue to think that we can only do the things that other people tell us we can do.

More to the point a quantum superposition, is in a sense, a simultaneous state of all states. Which is precisely the issue that Schroedinger wanted to address with his kitty thought experiment. The superposition exists in a state where it is unobserved. However, while the cat is dead, it is still alive as well and is able to observe itself. Constant self-observation by oneself kind of tosses the possibility of a quantum superposition out the window.

To further the discussion on Schroedinger's Cat, if that is the general consensus, we should start another thread and kind of go into the Copenhagen Interpretation itself, because Schroedinger's Cat came about because of errors in it.

On a side note, I'm not really all that versed in quantum mechanics or physics in general, it never really was one of my "things." I've read some articles from time to time and a lot of times I may just be grasping at straws. Needless to say, this is one of those areas that you may find "The Jesus' great knowledge" kind of lacking.

Sometimes if you're really into a series and you have a doujin from it, once you're all fapped out, you might wanna actually read it.

Actually, the cat isn't an analogy for anything. Schroedinger chose to use a cat in order to illustrate that the Copenhagen interpretation is inapplicable to everyday things, including lifeforms.

Before I go into anything, I suggest all of you to refer to Noein because it is essentially dealing with the same kind of theory.


That's not exactly correct. With Schroedinger's Cat there is a 50% chance that the poison will be released, meaning that the question is in fact whether the cat will be alive or dead.

Lets focus on the existence of multiple dimensions, which is the core of the topic. The existence of multiple worlds is a result of probability. When an action is taken and there are multiple outcomes, Hugh Everett's Many-Worlds Interpretation says that a new dimension is created from each possible outcome. The outcome of an event that created this dimension influenced the you that exists in it. Likewise, the you in another dimension is influenced by another possible outcome of that same event. Its impossible for you to exist in a dimension where another you, that corresponds to the events that created that dimension, exists because first of all, there is already a you there and second, your existence contradicts the essential foundation of that reality.

That may be true, but if you're hallucinating, aren't you perceiving something? It may be intangible, but the fact that you perceive something affirms its existence. Think about nothing. I mean we can say that nothing doesn't exist and technically we would be right. However, the simple fact that we can even say "nothing" doesn't exist, means that we are, in turn, affirming its existence as something.

Reality as it is, is conceived by perception. Infallible or not, one cannot deny what they experience through their senses. Likewise, if one perceives something within their mind, it is impossible to say that it doesn't exist, even if we can't have first hand knowledge of it.

I used to try to give myself mohawks which, I don't know why, I had trouble doing, I guess its because I'm kind of a perfectionist. After a while I realized that even if I got it right, the second I put my pants on it would just get all fucked up.

Shion is a trap, but Poison is kind of in the gray area. I chose Poison only because Yoshinori Ono stated that in America they made him/her/it(?) a post-op transsexual. In the Japanese version Poison is a newhalf and, as Ono put it, "simply tucks her business away to look female."